I'm restoring my 57 cub.I have the engine block in shop for machine work.While machine work is being done,I'mworking my way through the rest of the tractor,transmission,final drives,P.T.O.,etc.I have a 52 cub parts tractor.I noticed the difference in part #'s on the touch-control housing betweenthe 57 and the 52.The internal differences are quiet clear in the service manual and parts book.the 52 parts # is-351981R1.The 57 parts # is 860719R1.I intend to rebuild one or the other.My question is,are there any advantages/disadvantages between the two?Is one stronger than the other?
Thanks,Brockway
This site uses cookies to maintain login information on FarmallCub.Com. Click the X in the banner upper right corner to close this notice. For more information on our privacy policy, visit this link: Privacy Policy
NEW REGISTERED MEMBERS: Be sure to check your SPAM/JUNK folders for the activation email.
Touch-Control Rebuild
Forum rules
Notice: For sale and wanted posts are not allowed in this forum. Please use our free classifieds or one of our site sponsors for your tractor and parts needs.
Notice: For sale and wanted posts are not allowed in this forum. Please use our free classifieds or one of our site sponsors for your tractor and parts needs.
- EZ
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 1185
- Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 6:33 pm
- Zip Code: P0M1Z0
- Tractors Owned: 49 Cub
67 International Cub Loboy
57 Farmall 130 - Location: Northern Ontario
Brock,
The only thing I can tell you for sure, having just rebuilt one, the 719R1 has less parts to keep track of. There are 13 ring seals to change out in there. The kit for either is available through Case/IH. Also, of the two you mention, the 719R1 is the newer model. I'm not sure about the power difference between the two, but I suspect they are the same.
The only thing I can tell you for sure, having just rebuilt one, the 719R1 has less parts to keep track of. There are 13 ring seals to change out in there. The kit for either is available through Case/IH. Also, of the two you mention, the 719R1 is the newer model. I'm not sure about the power difference between the two, but I suspect they are the same.
Just Do It !
-
- Team Cub Guide
- Posts: 3280
- Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 4:54 pm
- Zip Code: 71203
- Tractors Owned: 1948,55, and 56 Farmall Cubs.
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Louisiana
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 3:02 pm
A meeting of the minds
Hey guys,
I am in Shreveport and could use some parts and advice. What do you say we all meet up somewhere when "HR" is in town, have a beverage and talk about tractors and women.......... and other things we don't understand.
Bobby W.
Shreveport
318-673-1237
I am in Shreveport and could use some parts and advice. What do you say we all meet up somewhere when "HR" is in town, have a beverage and talk about tractors and women.......... and other things we don't understand.
Bobby W.
Shreveport
318-673-1237
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is
-
- 10+ Years
- John *.?-!.* cub owner
- Cub Pro
- Posts: 23701
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 2:09 pm
- Zip Code: 63664
- Tractors Owned: 47, 48, 49 cub plus Wagner loader & other attachments. 41 Farmall H.
- Location: Mo, Potosi
Re: Touch-Control Rebuild
I've never directly compared the 2 myself, but what I understand from reading about them and from people that have both of them, the later one operates more smoothly, especially for small height adjustments.Brockway wrote:I noticed the difference in part #'s on the touch-control housing betweenthe 57 and the 52.The internal differences are quiet clear in the service manual and parts book.the 52 parts # is-351981R1.The 57 parts # is 860719R1.I intend to rebuild one or the other.My question is,are there any advantages/disadvantages between the two?Is one stronger than the other?
Thanks,Brockway
If you are not part of the solution,
you are part of the problem!!!
you are part of the problem!!!
-
- Team Cub
- Posts: 17278
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 2:59 pm
- Zip Code: 55319
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: MN
Re: Touch-Control Rebuild
John *.?-!.* cub owner wrote:I've never directly compared the 2 myself, but what I understand from reading about them and from people that have both of them, the later one operates more smoothly, especially for small height adjustments.
You talking about the 2 versions of hydraulics or comparing tractors and women?
- John *.?-!.* cub owner
- Cub Pro
- Posts: 23701
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 2:09 pm
- Zip Code: 63664
- Tractors Owned: 47, 48, 49 cub plus Wagner loader & other attachments. 41 Farmall H.
- Location: Mo, Potosi
-
- 10+ Years
Touch-Control Rebuild
Thanks for everyones reply.Sorry for the late rasponse,I haven't had access to my computer.E.Z.,I think I will rebuild the 719R1.H.R.,I'm north of I-20,approx.7 mi.from Pilot.As for parts tractors,I don't know of any at this time.I have lots of parts,maybe I can help.Bobby,as for a meeting somewhere,I 'm all for it.Maybe y'all can meet at my place if you'd like.I'm about 6 mi. northeast pf La. Downs off highway 80.Jim,I see your from Texas.May I ask what city?
Brockway
Brockway
-
- Team Cub
- Posts: 17278
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 2:59 pm
- Zip Code: 55319
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: MN
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests