I have a early '48 Cub with low compression and is very difficult to start & keep running. I have seen some in-frame rebuild kits and wanted to know if anyone has some experience or advice with an in-frame rebuild kit. My thoughts are to do a valve job and an in-frame kit that will include new rings & pistons that will increase my compression.
I'm not really interested in doing an overhaul and complete restoration just yet. I would like to get it running and enjoy it for a while before going that far.
Any thoughts or suggestions before going down this path would be greatly appreciated.
This site uses cookies to maintain login information on FarmallCub.Com. Click the X in the banner upper right corner to close this notice. For more information on our privacy policy, visit this link: Privacy Policy
NEW REGISTERED MEMBERS: Be sure to check your SPAM/JUNK folders for the activation email.
In-Frame Engine rebuild
Forum rules
Notice: For sale and wanted posts are not allowed in this forum. Please use our free classifieds or one of our site sponsors for your tractor and parts needs.
Notice: For sale and wanted posts are not allowed in this forum. Please use our free classifieds or one of our site sponsors for your tractor and parts needs.
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 9:04 pm
- Zip Code: 76513
-
- Team Cub Mentor
- Posts: 20370
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:52 pm
- Zip Code: 65051
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Mo. Linn
Re: In-Frame Engine rebuild
I would pull the engine and put on a stand or the bench. Much easier to access the engine for measurements.
I have an excuse. CRS.
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 1050
- Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 10:47 am
- Zip Code: 44266
- Tractors Owned: 48 F Cub #11678
65 Cub Cadet 104
70 450C JD loader
67 Cub Cadet 107
90 B7100HST-D Kubota
72 Cub Cadet 149
54 Super C - Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Ravenna, Ohio
Re: In-Frame Engine rebuild
I agree with Eugene but I also understand not wanting to tear the tractor apart. I've done what you are suggesting and it's very do-able. Two other drawbacks are you can't change the front or rear main seals. The front seal requires taking off the front end of the tractor (and a special puller for the front pulley) and the rear seal, a split at the bell housing. Mic'ing and plasti-gauging require crawling around under the tractor and FWIW the rear bolts on the oil pan are no picnic to re-install. If you find the cylinder bores are too far out of spec you'll need to take the engine out anyway, I got lucky. I replaced the front seal on mine as it was leaking pretty badly but not the rear, it wasn't leaking (and still isn't ). On the plus side ol' Smokey is running real well now, maybe a bit stronger than before, good oil pressure, and no more blue smoke!
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 1421
- Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 2:54 pm
- Zip Code: 60073
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: IL, Round Lake Heights
Re: In-Frame Engine rebuild
Unless you have the tools and knowledge to mic it out, I agree with Eugene that you are better off pulling the block, and would add that you should take it to a machine shop to have it measured and see where you are. Not much sense in replacing pistons and rings unless you know whether or not you need to go oversize.
When I did the engine on my 59, everything was within specs. If I had just bought a kit, the pistons would have been wasted money.
When I did the engine on my 59, everything was within specs. If I had just bought a kit, the pistons would have been wasted money.
Michael Cummings
Eddie - a 1959 International Lo-Boy named after my father in law, who who bought her new.
Eddie - a 1959 International Lo-Boy named after my father in law, who who bought her new.
-
- Team Cub Mentor
- Posts: 20370
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:52 pm
- Zip Code: 65051
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Mo. Linn
Re: In-Frame Engine rebuild
Engine block is not sleeved. Do not purchase a kit until the engine has been measured to determine needed machine work and parts.pferguson1962 wrote:I have seen some in-frame rebuild kits.
I have an excuse. CRS.
- PVF1799
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 1475
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 9:46 pm
- Zip Code: 12009
- eBay ID: kepara
- Tractors Owned: 1929 Farmall Regular #T111250 (Original Owner)
1942 Farmall M #55654
1948 Farmall Cub #21005
1955 Farmall Cub #190769
1961 Cub Cadet #16509
1975 Cub Cadet 1250H
197x IH 990 Haybine
1994 JD 5320 Diesel
Attachments: Woods 42F Fast Hitch, L38 Disc Fast Hitch, F11 Plow Fast Hitch, Land Plow, Snow Plow, Grader Blade, Planter w/Fertilizer, Cultivators, Hilling Disks, Sickle Bar Mower(2), IH 7' Sickle Bar Mower, Flail Mower and 5' International Belly Mower. - Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Altamont, NY
- Contact:
Re: In-Frame Engine rebuild
The most important thing I learned on this forum since I started the restoration of Rex '48 is to follow the recommendations from the members of this forum. Each and every time I've departed from this - I'd wished I had not. Having done in-frame rebuilds with my father and brother as a youth it's just much easier to have it on a stand as recommended herein. Also, by sending it out it will be boiled out and clean inside and out for better performance and painting.
Ken
Ken
Ken
Pleasant View Farm - Est. 1799
1930 Farmall Restoration Project
My Restoration Project - FCUB '48 - Rex
Pleasant View Farm - Est. 1799
1930 Farmall Restoration Project
My Restoration Project - FCUB '48 - Rex
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 8:34 am
- Zip Code: 97123
Re: In-Frame Engine rebuild
Definitely recommend pulling it even though I agree its a lot more work.
I was a diesel and heavy equipment mechanic for 15 years and the partial rebuilds didnt work out well too many times.
While occasionaly you can get away with a ring job to "get by" usually by the time the rings have worn down you will have critical dimensions wrong such as cylinder taper,out of round, scoring and a top cylinder ridge that can break your new rings/piston if not removed.
Also without a proper cylinder crosshatch your new rings may not seat in causing a lot of the problems you now have.
Add to this not being able to clean/hot tank the block well and not being able to repalace oil seals that may fail soon.
If done right the first time you will have a solid base to build and restore the rest of the Cub.
Good luck and enjoy the time spent on this fun hobby
I was a diesel and heavy equipment mechanic for 15 years and the partial rebuilds didnt work out well too many times.
While occasionaly you can get away with a ring job to "get by" usually by the time the rings have worn down you will have critical dimensions wrong such as cylinder taper,out of round, scoring and a top cylinder ridge that can break your new rings/piston if not removed.
Also without a proper cylinder crosshatch your new rings may not seat in causing a lot of the problems you now have.
Add to this not being able to clean/hot tank the block well and not being able to repalace oil seals that may fail soon.
If done right the first time you will have a solid base to build and restore the rest of the Cub.
Good luck and enjoy the time spent on this fun hobby
- ricky racer
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 6336
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:40 pm
- Zip Code: 49120
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Niles / Buchanan, Michigan
Re: In-Frame Engine rebuild
Fireman Bob wrote:Definitely recommend pulling it even though I agree its a lot more work.
I was a diesel and heavy equipment mechanic for 15 years and the partial rebuilds didnt work out well too many times.
While occasionaly you can get away with a ring job to "get by" usually by the time the rings have worn down you will have critical dimensions wrong such as cylinder taper,out of round, scoring and a top cylinder ridge that can break your new rings/piston if not removed.
Also without a proper cylinder crosshatch your new rings may not seat in causing a lot of the problems you now have.
Add to this not being able to clean/hot tank the block well and not being able to repalace oil seals that may fail soon.
If done right the first time you will have a solid base to build and restore the rest of the Cub.
Good luck and enjoy the time spent on this fun hobby
I could not agree more!!!
1929 Farmall Regular
1935 John Deere B
1937 John Deere A
1941 John Deere H
1952 John Deere B
1953 Farmall Cub
1935 John Deere B
1937 John Deere A
1941 John Deere H
1952 John Deere B
1953 Farmall Cub
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ike and 33 guests