This site uses cookies to maintain login information on FarmallCub.Com. Click the X in the banner upper right corner to close this notice. For more information on our privacy policy, visit this link: Privacy Policy
NEW REGISTERED MEMBERS: Be sure to check your SPAM/JUNK folders for the activation email.
Universal Mounting Frame Differences
Forum rules
Notice: For sale and wanted posts are not allowed in this forum. Please use our free classifieds or one of our site sponsors for your tractor and parts needs.
Notice: For sale and wanted posts are not allowed in this forum. Please use our free classifieds or one of our site sponsors for your tractor and parts needs.
- Slim140
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 4908
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:24 am
- Zip Code: 00000
- Tractors Owned: .
1970 International 140
1972 International 140
1949 John Deere A
1993 Ford 4630 W/Loader
1965 John Deere 110
1961 Cub Cadet Original - Circle of Safety: Y
Universal Mounting Frame Differences
I recently acquired another UMF with the purchase of a fast hitch. The man told me it came off a later Cub. I drug out another UMF I had in the shed and got to noticing a little change. The rod is bigger on the newer one where the yoke/nut is on the newer one. The older one is tapered and the nut isn't there, someone took it off I reckon. The yoke is longer on the older one but beefier on the newer one even though it's shorter. The lift rod on the newer one has a hole and a pin sticking out of it. Anybody know when they changed these? What is the purpose of the pin and hole on the newer lift rod?
Every home is a school, what are you teaching?
-
- Team Cub
- Posts: 17214
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 2:59 pm
- Zip Code: 55319
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: MN
Re: Universal Mounting Frame Differences
The hole and pin end of the lifting pipe was added on the left side for compatibility with the Fast-Hitch. Without it, the hitch and lifting pipe both need to use the same pin on the Touch-Control rockshaft. Evidently, the double bend of the lifting pipe extension was added later, the big locknuts even later. You may also find the keyholes where the tool bars attach to the mounting frames are not countersunk on the later ones.
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 5184
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 2:08 pm
- Zip Code: 12514
- Circle of Safety: Y
Re: Universal Mounting Frame Differences
the mounting frame with the lock nuts is the late style as the early ones were weaker at the ends and can bend
- Glen
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 6095
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:33 pm
- Zip Code: 00000
- Tractors Owned: 1956 Farmall Cub with Fast Hitch, F-11 plow, Disc, Cultivator, Cub-22 mower
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Wa.
Re: Universal Mounting Frame Differences
Hi,
Here is a page from the 1965 Cub 144 cultivator owner's manual showing the left side lift rod made for the Fast Hitch lift. It is numbers 3 and 4 in the upper pic. If you don't need the rod for use with a Fast Hitch, I know someone that might want to buy it.
http://farmallcub.com/rudi_cub/www.clea ... age-11.jpg
Here is a page from the 1965 Cub 144 cultivator owner's manual showing the left side lift rod made for the Fast Hitch lift. It is numbers 3 and 4 in the upper pic. If you don't need the rod for use with a Fast Hitch, I know someone that might want to buy it.
http://farmallcub.com/rudi_cub/www.clea ... age-11.jpg
- Slim140
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 4908
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:24 am
- Zip Code: 00000
- Tractors Owned: .
1970 International 140
1972 International 140
1949 John Deere A
1993 Ford 4630 W/Loader
1965 John Deere 110
1961 Cub Cadet Original - Circle of Safety: Y
Re: Universal Mounting Frame Differences
Thanks Jim, Tim & Glen for your feedback. Jim I looked at what I have and the countersink on this later one is no where near as deep as the older one but it is there. Tim, I have a couple older ones that are bent where you say. Glen, I do intend to use it on the Cub the hitch is going on. I may even be converting one of my older ones to look like the later ones
Every home is a school, what are you teaching?
- Super A
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 5228
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2004 10:53 am
- Zip Code: 28521
- Tractors Owned: Collector of Super As, Corn Pickers, and a buncha other junk. Even a Cub now and then...
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: NC, Jacksonville area
Re: Universal Mounting Frame Differences
Chipmaker wrote: The rod is bigger on the newer one where the yoke/nut is on the newer one. The older one is tapered and the nut isn't there, someone took it off I reckon.
The older ones with the taper didn't have a jam nut on the like the newer ones.
Al
White Demo Super A Restoration Updates
Let us pray for farmers and all who prepare the soil for planting, that the seeds they sow may lead to a bountiful harvest.
Celebrating 75 years of the Super A: 1947-2022
Let us pray for farmers and all who prepare the soil for planting, that the seeds they sow may lead to a bountiful harvest.
Celebrating 75 years of the Super A: 1947-2022
- Slim140
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 4908
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:24 am
- Zip Code: 00000
- Tractors Owned: .
1970 International 140
1972 International 140
1949 John Deere A
1993 Ford 4630 W/Loader
1965 John Deere 110
1961 Cub Cadet Original - Circle of Safety: Y
Re: Universal Mounting Frame Differences
Here's the minimal countersink on the later one.
Every home is a school, what are you teaching?
- Slim140
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 4908
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:24 am
- Zip Code: 00000
- Tractors Owned: .
1970 International 140
1972 International 140
1949 John Deere A
1993 Ford 4630 W/Loader
1965 John Deere 110
1961 Cub Cadet Original - Circle of Safety: Y
Re: Universal Mounting Frame Differences
This later one does NOT have grease fittings on it. The boss is there for the tapped hole (circled it in red) but neither side has a grease fitting hole. Here's photos of the later without and the older with. Why would they not put grease fittings in? Save money? Grease fitting man on vacation that day?
Every home is a school, what are you teaching?
-
- Team Cub
- Posts: 17214
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 2:59 pm
- Zip Code: 55319
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: MN
Re: Universal Mounting Frame Differences
Chipmaker wrote:Here's the minimal countersink on the later one.
Looks like that minimal countersink may have been added by a tapered nut when an earlier tool bar was attached.
- Slim140
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 4908
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:24 am
- Zip Code: 00000
- Tractors Owned: .
1970 International 140
1972 International 140
1949 John Deere A
1993 Ford 4630 W/Loader
1965 John Deere 110
1961 Cub Cadet Original - Circle of Safety: Y
Re: Universal Mounting Frame Differences
Jim Becker wrote:Chipmaker wrote:Here's the minimal countersink on the later one.
Looks like that minimal countersink may have been added by a tapered nut when an earlier tool bar was attached.
Why did they get away from the tapered nut?
Every home is a school, what are you teaching?
-
- Team Cub
- Posts: 17214
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 2:59 pm
- Zip Code: 55319
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: MN
Re: Universal Mounting Frame Differences
Chipmaker wrote:Why did they get away from the tapered nut?
I have nothing that says. My guess is the same for both this and the missing grease fittings. It saved some money and nobody would notice.
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 5184
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 2:08 pm
- Zip Code: 12514
- Circle of Safety: Y
Re: Universal Mounting Frame Differences
when they changed from the old style to new style the nut became a normal flat nut
- Stevetractor
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 1:03 pm
- Zip Code: B0v1a0
- Tractors Owned: 1952 Farmall Cub
1955 Farmall Cub
1968 International Cub - Contact:
Re: Universal Mounting Frame Differences
Not to hyjack the post but... I went to put my cultivators on my recently rebuilt 68 today and ran into something interesting. Figured it would be easy as I've used the same setup on my 52 for 15 years. First thing I noticed front gangs were a bit out of level front to back. No problem, losenend up jam nuts on the universal frame and adjusted the yokes to level. Since I'm a bit fussy, flipped all the shovels to get even lengths and got it just right. Well then on with the rear gangs. Well they were about 5 " higher than the front??? Lucky I have some spares around and the pressure rods were about 6" longer. I'm guessing maybe these were off an A at some point. The other difference in them was the rear Cub pressure rods are shaped like a hook on the bottom where they hook in the gangs. These just were bent on a 90 degree. These seem factory as they were complete units. Anyone ever run into this? Have to park both tractors side by side and measure rear lift height. Was this ever changed over the years? The lift rods from the touch control are both original and in good shape. Sorry I'm so long winded. Opinions?
-
- Team Cub
- Posts: 17214
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 2:59 pm
- Zip Code: 55319
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: MN
Re: Universal Mounting Frame Differences
The pressure rods with the 90 degree bend came from something else.
- Slim140
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 4908
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:24 am
- Zip Code: 00000
- Tractors Owned: .
1970 International 140
1972 International 140
1949 John Deere A
1993 Ford 4630 W/Loader
1965 John Deere 110
1961 Cub Cadet Original - Circle of Safety: Y
Re: Universal Mounting Frame Differences
I looked at the UMF on Walt (pay no attention to the blue paint, I didn't know about the pigment shortage because of the war until Jim Becker told me that and only the very early ones are blue, these will be red when it comes to restoration time). These are the later style but they have the grease fitting on each side.
Every home is a school, what are you teaching?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Glen and 27 guests