This site uses cookies to maintain login information on FarmallCub.Com. Click the X in the banner upper right corner to close this notice. For more information on our privacy policy, visit this link: Privacy Policy
NEW REGISTERED MEMBERS: Be sure to check your SPAM/JUNK folders for the activation email.
H or M
Forum rules
Notice: For sale and wanted posts are not allowed in this forum. Please use our free classifieds or one of our site sponsors for your tractor and parts needs.
Notice: For sale and wanted posts are not allowed in this forum. Please use our free classifieds or one of our site sponsors for your tractor and parts needs.
- Poncho
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:57 pm
- Zip Code: 55906
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Rochester, MN
H or M
I am considering purchasing an H or M with a wide front end to plow my longer driveway with. I have access to an M without a loader on and a narrow front end. But I was thinking that an H would move almost as snow as the M and I would also be able to put a mower on it. I also have some dirt to move. Any bits of advice would be appreciated. Thanks, Poncho
1950 Demonstrator Cub
Woods 59 Mower
Cub 54A Blade
Cub 22 Sickle Mower
Model 100 McCormick spreader
Woods 59 Mower
Cub 54A Blade
Cub 22 Sickle Mower
Model 100 McCormick spreader
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:43 am
- Zip Code: 72455
- Location: AR. Pocahontas
Re: H or M
Poncho ,
I have a M with a swartz wide front, hydrualics starts run good I use it to bushhog and disking works great for what I do.
I had a H before the M used it the same way and same equipment it had a narrow front both run like a top.The M gained me about 5-7 HP but the H has a slower first gear wich I liked better.I would open it up it first gear good pace for going around the woods and trees bushhoging etc.The M if I run it the same I have to throttel it back to slow down it in turns slow down the PTO.
Your talking about plowing personally I would go with the H having the slower 1st gear means it might take you longer to plow but you also have more time to avoid things that could ruin your weekend.
Sure you will gain HP with the M but you will also gain ground speed.I plow ( dirt or snow ) as slow as possible with my cub incase of hitting anything it just stops instead of tearing anything up.
BTW the swartz wide front end will turn shorter than the IH fronts.
I have a M with a swartz wide front, hydrualics starts run good I use it to bushhog and disking works great for what I do.
I had a H before the M used it the same way and same equipment it had a narrow front both run like a top.The M gained me about 5-7 HP but the H has a slower first gear wich I liked better.I would open it up it first gear good pace for going around the woods and trees bushhoging etc.The M if I run it the same I have to throttel it back to slow down it in turns slow down the PTO.
Your talking about plowing personally I would go with the H having the slower 1st gear means it might take you longer to plow but you also have more time to avoid things that could ruin your weekend.
Sure you will gain HP with the M but you will also gain ground speed.I plow ( dirt or snow ) as slow as possible with my cub incase of hitting anything it just stops instead of tearing anything up.
BTW the swartz wide front end will turn shorter than the IH fronts.
1972int.cub , c-3 int mower , 54a blade
1950 M farmall "under construction"
If a word is misspelled in the dictionary who would know? from uncle johns bathroom reader
1950 M farmall "under construction"
If a word is misspelled in the dictionary who would know? from uncle johns bathroom reader
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:16 pm
- Zip Code: 52742
- Tractors Owned: Check out my signature!
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: IA, DeWitt
Re: H or M
Poncho,
Either would be a good tractor. Driven both. Easy to work on and parts still fairly cheap. I'm alittle more partial to an M. Alittle bigger and alittle more guts to pull with. Either will run a mower. Can find nice ones still reasonably priced too. Good luck on your search.
Red56
Either would be a good tractor. Driven both. Easy to work on and parts still fairly cheap. I'm alittle more partial to an M. Alittle bigger and alittle more guts to pull with. Either will run a mower. Can find nice ones still reasonably priced too. Good luck on your search.
Red56
Tractors in the stable: '62 560D Cub Cadets in the stable: 782D, 1572 SGT, 1772 SGT, 1782 SGT
-
- 10+ Years
Re: H or M
Which ever one you get the best deal on! Both will do what you want pretty nicely. Let the tractor condition and price be your guide.
- SONNY
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 4087
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:26 pm
- Zip Code: 61722
Re: H or M
If you want to do serious snow removal,---better go with an M!----H no good after a certain point,--too light, not enough power! ---fine tractor for mowing with a small mower!----Better yet,--get one of each!!!---can't go wrong there!! thanks; sonny
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:14 pm
- Zip Code: 51646
- Location: New Market, Iowa
- Contact:
Re: H or M
An H will surprise you with its capabilities. An H will move every bit as much snow as an M, but maybe not as fast. If the H is not big enough to dig out your driveway in a timely fashion, the M won't do it either.
Here is a picture of my 1950 H snow fighter.
Here is a picture of my 1950 H snow fighter.
- John *.?-!.* cub owner
- Cub Pro
- Posts: 23701
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 2:09 pm
- Zip Code: 63664
- Tractors Owned: 47, 48, 49 cub plus Wagner loader & other attachments. 41 Farmall H.
- Location: Mo, Potosi
Re: H or M
Hey Rusty, I have a loader just like that except it is equipped with a bucket/manure fork rather than a blade. I plan to install it when I get around to rebuilding a pair of cylinders.
If you are not part of the solution,
you are part of the problem!!!
you are part of the problem!!!
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:14 pm
- Zip Code: 51646
- Location: New Market, Iowa
- Contact:
Re: H or M
I have the original bucket also. The bucket comes off and the blade goes on for winter. Just as soon as winter is over (whenever that will be), the bucket will be put back on.
- Mag Man
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 3:34 pm
- Location: Central NY
- Contact:
Re: H or M
Dangit loren quit posting pics of my tractors will ya. LOL
- tractorfan1
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:03 pm
- Location: New Brunswick,Canada
- Contact:
Re: H or M
An H would make a great tractor to mow with and move snow. Our '48 H had a front loader with a 7' blade, I plowed in 4th gear 3/4 throttle. Worked fine, but without loaded tires I needed chains...
Brett (aka Tractorfan1)
http://tractorfan1.tripod.com
1947 Cub, 1948 Cub, 1948 H, 1952 Super M, 1966 806, 1983 Cub Cadet 182, 1974 Cub Cadet 76. Looking for a 1206!!!
http://tractorfan1.tripod.com
1947 Cub, 1948 Cub, 1948 H, 1952 Super M, 1966 806, 1983 Cub Cadet 182, 1974 Cub Cadet 76. Looking for a 1206!!!
- Poncho
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:57 pm
- Zip Code: 55906
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Rochester, MN
Re: H or M
Does stability matter with a narrow or wide front end? My mother-in-law has the M with a narrow front. I would need to find a loader. Are they difficult to find?
1950 Demonstrator Cub
Woods 59 Mower
Cub 54A Blade
Cub 22 Sickle Mower
Model 100 McCormick spreader
Woods 59 Mower
Cub 54A Blade
Cub 22 Sickle Mower
Model 100 McCormick spreader
- Bigdog
- Team Cub Mentor
- Posts: 24144
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 12:50 pm
- Zip Code: 43113
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: OH, Circleville
- Contact:
Re: H or M
Wide fronts are somewhat more stable but narrow fronts are fine if you keep the load as low as possible until it is necessary to raise it. The loaders are pretty common and I see them advertised for sale all the time.
Bigdog
If you can't fix it with a hammer, you've got an electrical problem.
My wife says I don't listen to her. - - - - - - - - Or something like that!
http://www.cubtug.com
If you can't fix it with a hammer, you've got an electrical problem.
My wife says I don't listen to her. - - - - - - - - Or something like that!
http://www.cubtug.com
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:14 pm
- Zip Code: 51646
- Location: New Market, Iowa
- Contact:
Re: H or M
There is really not a lot of difference in the stability of a narrow front versus a wide front. It has been proven more than once that a tractor equipped with a wide front axle will upset just as easily as a tractor with a narrow front axle.
If you really think you need a wide front, I can get you a brand new Schwartz wide front axle.
If you really think you need a wide front, I can get you a brand new Schwartz wide front axle.
- Poncho
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:57 pm
- Zip Code: 55906
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Rochester, MN
Re: H or M
I am not sure if I really need the wide front or just want it. I also need to check about a 3 point hitch on the tractor.
1950 Demonstrator Cub
Woods 59 Mower
Cub 54A Blade
Cub 22 Sickle Mower
Model 100 McCormick spreader
Woods 59 Mower
Cub 54A Blade
Cub 22 Sickle Mower
Model 100 McCormick spreader
- schmibm
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 691
- Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 10:37 pm
- Location: Janesville, IA
Re: H or M
Narrow fronts turn much better too. You can spin them on a dime if you need. You need a back 40 to turn a wide front. And folks are right, they are not that much more stable. They still pivot in the middle.
1949 Project Cub
1955 Cub Lo-Boy "Jack"
1957 Cub Lo-Boy "Mac"
1957 Cub with 5' Woods Belly Mower "James"
24 other Farmalls A thru SMTA.
1955 Cub Lo-Boy "Jack"
1957 Cub Lo-Boy "Mac"
1957 Cub with 5' Woods Belly Mower "James"
24 other Farmalls A thru SMTA.
Return to “Farmall / IH / CASE”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests