Hydro or standard tranny with an FEL????

IHC Cub Cadet Forum -- Questions and answers to all of your Cadet related issues.

Moderator: Team Cub

Forum rules
Notice: For sale and wanted posts are not allowed in this forum. Please use our free classifieds or one of our site sponsors for your tractor and parts needs.
10+ Years
10+ Years
Posts: 6315
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 5:02 pm
Zip Code: 00000
Location: in northern usa

Hydro or standard tranny with an FEL????

Postby BigBill » Tue May 11, 2010 6:32 pm

I'm planning on building an FEL for one of my cub cadets after i finish up my 154 fel. I used my neighbors 147 cadet with the fel and i find it hard to operate everything at the sametime. I was wondering if a standard tranny maybe easier to operate with an FEL? Bill
I'm technically misunderstood at times i guess its been this way my whole life so why should it change now.

User avatar
10+ Years
10+ Years
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 11:35 am
Zip Code: 14072
eBay ID: toysforjake
Tractors Owned: Lots of Cub Cadets!
1951 Farmall Cub
1977 IH Cub
1966 IH Cub
1965 IH Lo Boy
1964 IH Lo Boy
1949 Farmall Cub
Several IH 154 Lo Boys
1979 IH 184 Lo Boy
Simplicity 4416 Sovereign
Simplicity Conquest
Simplicity Legacy 4x4 Diesel
Mitsubishi MT180D 4x4 Diesel
Circle of Safety: Y
Location: Grand Island, NY

Re: Hydro or standard tranny with an FEL????

Postby gitractorman » Tue May 11, 2010 6:45 pm

Yes, I think that it would be easier to stop when you are going into a pile to pick up a load of something, where you are working the loader lever with one hand and steering with the other, you can just push the clutch pedal to stop your motion. However, I think that shifting gears would be a real pain in the rear every time that you want to change direction. A hydrostatic drive would be much simpler to switch from forward to reverse, but you cannot keep your hand on the steering wheel if you are working the loader levers.

I have to admit, I am spoiled. My new Simplicity Legacy XL with foot controlled hydrostatic drive is amazing, and I wouldn't trade it for anything when I'm using the loader.

Cub Cadets 682, 1811, 1864, Simplicity Legacy XL 4x4 Diesel with FEL, 60" mower, 50" Tiller

10+ Years
10+ Years
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 12:03 am
Location: Cadott Wi.

Re: Hydro or standard tranny with an FEL????

Postby lonnyb » Wed May 12, 2010 1:22 am

I had my FEL on a 123 hydrostactic and found out fast I did not have enough hands to run all the controls, and it did not take more than a couple of hours to switch everything over to my 12 horse powered cub cadet 72 gear drive and it is a lot nicer to operate. Yes shifting can be a hassle but I find it easyer to control the tractor without growing a third arm.
Is one cub ever enough ?

cub cadet people
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:37 am
Zip Code: 06468
Tractors Owned: 1940 Farmall H
1945 Farmall A
1949 Super A
Farmall BN
1951 Farmall Cub
1961 Cub Lowboy
Gravely 810
1967 Cub Cadet 102
1967 Cub Cadet 122
1968 Cub Cadet 72
1968 Cub Cadet 72
1968 Cub Cadet 104
1968 Cub Cadet 125
1969 Cub Cadet 124
1971 Cub Cadet 147
1971 Cub Cadet 149
1974 Cub Cadet 108

Re: Hydro or standard tranny with an FEL????

Postby cub cadet people » Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:46 pm

My 147 has a FEL and when you drive into a pile you have to control the loader, control the hydro, it's too much work. 3 speeds are great for that stuff. I am planing to convert mine from hydro to standard.

  • Similar Topics
    Last post

Return to “Cub Cadet”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests