Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:39 pm


Tue Oct 23, 2012 10:42 pm
Wed Oct 24, 2012 5:28 am
Thu Oct 25, 2012 6:28 am
Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:46 am
I only had to go a mile, but by the feel it was no more than 4,000 pounds at most, and the Ranger is rated for 5,700 pound trailer. the nose of the trailer was a little heavy, but for that short a tip it was not a problem. I guaranty, I would not take off on a longer highway trip with a setup like that. at least not without electric brakes on the trailer.JackF wrote:At first I thought that was a photoshop,.......!
Fri Oct 26, 2012 6:31 pm
Sun Oct 28, 2012 11:41 am
I don't see nothing wrong with those loads.John *.?-!.* cub owner wrote:Sumthin just ain't right about these loads.
Or with those tires that are the same ones that were on that trailer 35 years agoJohn *.?-!.* cub owner wrote:...... I guaranty, I would not take off on a longer highway trip with a setup like that. at least not without electric brakes on the trailer.
You know for a guy that carries around a tape measure....................That's a 13' x 7' bed...........Since you didn't measure it I guess that's why you need to carry the tape.John *.?-!.* cub owner wrote: Most of that lumber is 12 to 16 feet long seasoned oak.
Naw, didn't get a motor with it, and besides mostly big round bales around now. You'd need something the size of a cub power unitRabbit Holler Flash wrote:..... Scrivet you aint plannin on tryin to feed bales up it n bury me like ol times ????
Sun Oct 28, 2012 11:53 am
Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:12 pm
Sun Oct 28, 2012 10:56 pm
Truthfully I hadn't thought much about it until Barb mentioned it. You can thank your cousin for that idea.Scrivet wrote:........ PRICELESS(to John because he's NEVER going to let me forget it!)