Which sand blaster works better

Tools and Reviews to help your fellow Cubber's.

Moderator: Team Cub

Forum rules
Unwarranted FLAME reviews will be deleted without notice. Members are encouraged to exhaust all arbitration efforts with the companies before posting negative reviews here.

FarmallCub.Com and the moderators are not responsible for member reviews of businesses and attractions.

Send issues regarding reviews to Cub@farmallcub.com.

Which sand blaster works better

Postby Jason (IL) » Fri Apr 05, 2013 12:36 pm

I am looking to get a blaster set up, I have a 5hp 80 gal 17 cfm compressor. I have a small bucket blaster but the sand is always getting clogged up in the hose. It is as if it is sucking in all the sand at once. So which is better, the tank or open bucket version?

I did start to just pull it out of the bucket one day, it worked better for a while but soon it was back to the same old same clog and nothing comes out.

Suggestions, should I try to reduce to hole in the bottom of the bucket some? just a thought to get it to the point where it won't pull so much sand.

Thanks
Jason (IL)
501 Club
501 Club
 
Posts: 817
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 10:44 pm
Location: Gibson City, IL
Zip Code: 60936
Tractors Owned: 47 Cub SN 8664
48 Cub
50 Demo
54 Cub
55 Cub
2-56 Cub
55 LOBOY SN 876
57 LOBOY
2- 60 LOBOY
54 Super M
57 300LP
57 450
Cub Cadet 123
Circle of Safety Award
Circle of Safety: Y

Re: Which sand blaster works better

Postby Don McCombs » Fri Apr 05, 2013 3:19 pm

Just a couple of suggestions. Your sand must be perfectly dry for any blaster to work, regardless of the type. So make sure your media is dry. Also, it is important that you have some means of removing moisture from your compressed air system. Both of these moisture sources will cause clogging problems.
Last edited by Don McCombs on Fri Apr 05, 2013 6:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Don McCombs
MD, Deep Creek Lake

"1950 Something" Farmall Cub
1977 International Cub w/FH
1978 International Cub
1948 Farmall Super A
1951 Farmall Super C w/FH
User avatar
Don McCombs
Team Cub Mentor
Team Cub Mentor
 
Posts: 10374
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 6:45 am
Location: MD, Deep Creek Lake
Zip Code: 21550
Tractors Owned: "1950 Something" Farmall Cub
1977 International Cub w/FH
1978 International Cub
1948 Farmall Super A
1951 Farmall Super C w/FH
Circle of Safety Award
Circle of Safety: Y

Re: Which sand blaster works better

Postby tmays » Fri Apr 05, 2013 3:33 pm

Also make sure there are no small rocks to clog it. I filter my sand with screen when I put it in tank
Thomas
tmays
501 Club
501 Club
 
Posts: 1430
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 8:59 pm
Location: Raymond, MS
Zip Code: 39154
Tractors Owned: 1972 Cub
1947 Cub
1952 Cub
152 plow
1953 Farmall Super C
154 Cub Loboy
44 LB Woods mower
23A disk
144 Cultivators
Poplarville disc
54A blade
Gaylott scoop
193 Moldboard plow
Cub 22 mower
Woods 42
IH C-2
174 Planter/Fertilizer
Rotary Hoe

Re: Which sand blaster works better

Postby Bill V in Md » Fri Apr 05, 2013 3:40 pm

Jason,

I have a 10 gal. pressure tank sandblaster and it works very well for small jobs. One thing that really improved the operation was the addition of a small bowl type desiccant dryer. I picked up one from McMaster-Carr. The other thing I like about it is the desiccant can be removed, dryed in an oven and re-used. It does an excellent job of reducing moisture in the compressed air. Prior to that I was using filter type dryers with a couple of moisture traps in the piping runs, but the air line near the nozzle plugged frequently.
Bill VanHooser
1948 Cub w/ snowplow
User avatar
Bill V in Md
501 Club
501 Club
 
Posts: 540
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 6:51 pm
Location: MD, Catonsville
Zip Code: 21228
Circle of Safety Award
Circle of Safety: Y

Re: Which sand blaster works better

Postby Jason (IL) » Fri Apr 05, 2013 4:24 pm

I have a small moisture seperator so maybe I get a bigger one. I have used this little bucket blaster for 5 yrs and it seems I fight with it every time. So I was just wondering if I need to switch blaster units or not for better success.

Thanks
Jason
Jason (IL)
501 Club
501 Club
 
Posts: 817
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 10:44 pm
Location: Gibson City, IL
Zip Code: 60936
Tractors Owned: 47 Cub SN 8664
48 Cub
50 Demo
54 Cub
55 Cub
2-56 Cub
55 LOBOY SN 876
57 LOBOY
2- 60 LOBOY
54 Super M
57 300LP
57 450
Cub Cadet 123
Circle of Safety Award
Circle of Safety: Y

Re: Which sand blaster works better

Postby Bob McCarty » Fri Apr 05, 2013 5:30 pm

....or move to Colorado where dessicants, rust, and moisture problems are not in the vocabulary. :D

Bob
"We don't need to think more,
we need to think differently."
-Albert Einstein
Bob McCarty
Team Cub Mentor
Team Cub Mentor
 
Posts: 5428
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: CO, Longmont
Zip Code: 80501
Circle of Safety Award
Circle of Safety: Y

Re: Which sand blaster works better

Postby bob in CT » Fri Apr 05, 2013 5:44 pm

The ideal air system has as long a run as possible from the compressor using iron pipe with a pitch to it and a good drip leg with a drain valve. A filter set with a final desiccant that can be regenerated is the ticket as suggested and that should come off the vertical line going down to the drip leg. Sand blasting gobbles air and the pipe run gives a chance to condense out moisture to lighten the load on the dryer train that usually condenses in the tank under smaller demand. Then you need to size the blast nozzle to match your air supply- but is sure sounds like moisture is the issue.
User avatar
bob in CT
Cub Pro
Cub Pro
 
Posts: 5238
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 9:34 am
Location: CT, Manchester
Zip Code: 06040
Tractors Owned: 77 Cub (red); 74 Cub; 52 Cub; 50 Cub ( post-demo)
Circle of Safety Award
Circle of Safety: Y

Re: Which sand blaster works better

Postby John *.?-!.* cub owner » Fri Apr 05, 2013 8:22 pm

Most of the open bucket type systems I have seen, have a hole in the side of the fitting that goes into the bucket. Make sure the suction hose is not covering that hole.
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government
to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the
government lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." Patrick Henry
User avatar
John *.?-!.* cub owner
Team Cub Guide
Team Cub Guide
 
Posts: 19104
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 2:09 pm
Location: Mo, Potosi
Zip Code: 63664
Tractors Owned: 47, 48, 49 cub plus Wagner loader & other attachments. 41 Farmall H.

Re: Which sand blaster works better

Postby Bezirk » Fri Apr 05, 2013 9:00 pm

I would suggest Texas Blaster if you want a good quality pressurized unit, they are pricey, but very well made ( here in the U. S. oF A . ) if you can imagine that.
http://www.texasblaster.com
Berlin
I started out with nothing and now I only have half of that left !
User avatar
Bezirk
501 Club
501 Club
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:07 pm
Zip Code: 22843
Tractors Owned: Farmall Cub 1949, Oliver OC3 crawler 1951, Ford 8 N 1948, Oliver 77 Row Crop 1953, JohnDeere, La, 1941, John Deere 4115/w loader, 2004, John Deere stationary power unit LUC, Farmall M, 1946, Oliver 77 Row crop w/ loader
Circle of Safety Award
Circle of Safety: Y

Re: Which sand blaster works better

Postby Boss Hog » Sun Apr 07, 2013 9:27 am

I run my blast cabinet with 200 feet of hose and 3 traps one at the cabinet , drain your tank of water on a regular basis. that may solve your problem, or at lest help it
Boss
IN GOD WE TRUST
All others pay cash
Boss Hog
Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely byJohn Emerich Edward Dalberg

8th Va fest link viewtopic.php?f=8&t=81392&p=657790#p657790
User avatar
Boss Hog
Cub Pro
Cub Pro
 
Posts: 9662
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:35 pm
Location: VA. Randolph
Zip Code: 23962
eBay ID: dmb2613
Circle of Safety Award
Circle of Safety: Y


Return to Tool Talk and Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest