Hydraulic question

All non-Cub/Cadet/IH/Farmall/Case tractor and machinery discussions.

Moderator: Team Cub

Hydraulic question

Postby Dan Stuckey » Sun Apr 29, 2012 7:55 pm

Looking for some opinion from some that have knowledge of hydraulics. My friend just bought a utility trailer from a guy the builds them. He does a pretty good job at it and just built his first dumper. A 5 x 8 foot, dump trailer, titled at 3000#, single axle.



Well, my friend tore off a roof and had 2000 pounds of shingles in it and went to dump them at the local dump. Went to activate the dump, has a pump, resivior, and battery on the tongue in a metal box. Well the bed only lifted slightly and that was all. Hydraulics would not lift the bed hardly at all. My friend called the guy and the guy said he would replace the 2" ram with a 3 1/2" ram.



Does this seem like what should be what will fix the problem. Asked my friend if the were any rating plate on the pump but he didnt know. Hope what this guy is saying will fix this problem as I guided my pal towards this trailer. Thanks for any info from anyone that knows more than I on this.
Dan Stuckey
Cub Star
Cub Star
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 6:00 pm

Re: Hydraulic question

Postby RaymondDurban » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:33 pm

I have a small dump trailer as well. Mine is 5x8 with dual axles rated at 4k lbs (if I remember correctly).

On mine, if well loaded, the ram and hydraulics will have a hard time dumping the load. You can see the ram flexing the bottom of the floor as it pushes the load up. Several times I've had to help with unloading the material before the ram would finish the job. I'd be afraid of increasing the size of the ram or increasing the pressure of the pump for fear of structural damage to the frame or body of the container with it overloaded.

It could be that the pump is too small, the ram is too small, the battery wasn't charged fully, the geometry is setup wrong, the load was too far forward, the load was more than 2k lbs, or a combination of any of the above.
User avatar
RaymondDurban
Cub Pro
Cub Pro
 
Posts: 3776
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 7:45 pm
Location: CO, Peyton
Zip Code: 80831
Circle of Safety Award
Circle of Safety: Y

Re: Hydraulic question

Postby Eugene » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:33 pm

I didn't do the math but going from a 2 inch cylinder to a 3 1/2 inch cylinder will increase/improve the current lifiting ability of the cylinder by about 3 times.

Only problem is that the lift will be slower.
I have an excuse. CRS.
Eugene
Cub Pro
Cub Pro
 
Posts: 10948
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:52 pm
Location: Mo. Linn
Zip Code: 65051

Re: Hydraulic question

Postby Dale Shaw » Sun Apr 29, 2012 11:51 pm

Eugene wrote:Only problem is that the lift will be slower.


LOL, current cylinder WON't lift it. 3.5 x bigger should eventually lift it-making it much faster.
Dale Shaw
TN Cub Rescue- Out of the Hedgerows and Barns, and back into the Fields and Gardens where they belong.
Today's generation is so used to getting everything IN a box, they can't think OUTSIDE the box
User avatar
Dale Shaw
501 Club
501 Club
 
Posts: 6390
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:56 pm
Location: Tn, Crossville
Zip Code: 38571
eBay ID: shad3js
Tractors Owned: 49 cub Elmo
55 cub
79 cub
151 disc plow
152 disc plow
cultivators
cub 6 toolbar
193 plows
Circle of Safety Award
Circle of Safety: Y

Re: Hydraulic question

Postby Eugene » Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:26 am

Dale Shaw wrote:
Eugene wrote:Only problem is that the lift will be slower.
LOL, current cylinder WON't lift it. 3.5 x bigger should eventually lift it-making it much faster.
Semantics, Dale. Your statement is true. I assume they will have to unload the trailer to change the hydraulic cylinder.
I have an excuse. CRS.
Eugene
Cub Pro
Cub Pro
 
Posts: 10948
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:52 pm
Location: Mo. Linn
Zip Code: 65051

Re: Hydraulic question

Postby Bob Perry » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:04 am

I agree with everybody on this page- and I did the math- the force will be increased 3.06 times, using the pi x r squared formula. But then there's all those other factors mentioned above.
REMEMBER: Keep it correct, or you may have to face the

Image
User avatar
Bob Perry
501 Club
501 Club
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 3:30 pm
Location: Dartmouth, Massachusetts
Zip Code: 02748
Tractors Owned: :

1949 Farmall Cub / FH

1951 Farmall Cub / IH mower

1964 International Cub Lo-Boy / Woods 59 mower

1967 International Cub / FH

1946 Farmall H

1949 Farmall H

2 Doodle-Bugs, one's a GM with 2 trannies and the other one's a Ford Model A

7 Cub cadets

.

Re: Hydraulic question

Postby Rick Prentice » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:22 am

Dan, Eugene and Bob are pretty close with their figures. If you had a 2" cylinder with a 1.5" piston and a 2000psi pump, the cylinder would have about 6,283 psi of push, the same cylinder with a 3.5 bore would increase to 19,242. The 2" cylinder would travel roughly 6.1 inches per second and the 3.5 would only travel about 2" per second. That's calculations from Surplus Center's online calculators. Also make sure what Raymond says about the structure is going to handle the increased power.

You stated the shingles only weighed 2000 lbs, if the guy ever loads the trailer with good topsoil, the average cubic yard(thats only 3'x3'x3') weighs average 1.5 tons(3000lbs with online calculator)) so it doesn't take much to put a sizable load on the trailer real fast.

Rick
When I told my dad I've been misplacing things and doing stupid stuff----His reply---"It only gets better"
User avatar
Rick Prentice
TeamCubGuide
TeamCubGuide
 
Posts: 5323
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 7:24 am
Location: OH, Grand Rapids (historical town along the Maumee River)
Zip Code: 43522
Tractors Owned: 47(circle cub),48(Floyd),49,50demo from GW's collection),51,52(backhoe),53,54,55(Nickles)
Circle of Safety Award
Circle of Safety: Y

Re: Hydraulic question

Postby Dan Stuckey » Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:54 pm

Thanks for the knowledge guys. Lucky for my friend, there was a bobcat at the landfill and was able to drag off the shingles. So now he is waiting on the larger cylinder. Not much of a downside that it will lift slower. Better slower than not at all. Thanks
Dan Stuckey
Cub Star
Cub Star
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 6:00 pm


Return to Other Tractors and Machinery

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests