Farmall Cub Forum -- Questions and answers to all of your Cub related issues.
Moderator: Team Cub
by Eugene » Fri Jan 25, 2013 3:43 pm
CharlieB wrote:A question---The rings were really worn thin. Could someone have put in some low quality rings that would have worn like that? I was amazed that the new rings from NAPA were so much stiffer and strong feeling than the old rings.
Most probable answer is metal composition differences between the newly purchased rings and the previously installed rings.
I have an excuse. CRS.
-
Eugene
- Cub Pro

-
- Posts: 11027
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:52 pm
- Location: Mo. Linn
- Zip Code: 65051
by ntrenn » Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:15 pm
The rings in my loboy had a lot of side face wear to go with the OD wear. Yours may have been reringed some time ago. Pretty sure mine was not as the mechanic that worked on it was family (who just happens to work at Jacobi's). Did you check your wrist pins? You probably won't want to touch them at $20 a pin, but if they are less than 0.003 clearance, they'll be fine for a mowing machine. I put in the cheapo 5098X ring set and had almost exactly the same ring end gap as you measured, so we'll see how yours works out. The loboy was pretty strong right out of the box with only a rering and valve job.
They tell me that they still use them a lot in your area cultivating tobacco - got me to thinking - check the breather cup - no breather action will really impact liner and ring wear....
-
ntrenn
- Cub Star!!

-
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:55 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Zip Code: 47119
- Skype Name: ntrenn
- Tractors Owned: 63 Cub 221833 in family since '69
65 Lo-boy 19648 with an un-stuck #4 - it lives!!! 144 Cultivators with disc hillers 193 Plow 42C mower 59L mower mounted on the Fcub 23A Disc - lost possession
by ricky racer » Fri Jan 25, 2013 6:18 pm
Eugene wrote:CharlieB wrote:A question---The rings were really worn thin. Could someone have put in some low quality rings that would have worn like that? I was amazed that the new rings from NAPA were so much stiffer and strong feeling than the old rings.
Most probable answer is metal composition differences between the newly purchased rings and the previously installed rings.
Due to the wear on the worn rings, the cross section of each ring is greater on the new ring which will make the new rings stiffer too.
Last edited by ricky racer on Sat Jan 26, 2013 9:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
1929 Farmall Regular 1935 John Deere B 1937 John Deere A 1941 John Deere H 1952 John Deere B 1953 Farmall Cub
-

ricky racer
- 501 Club

-
- Posts: 2115
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:40 pm
- Location: Niles / Buchanan, Michigan
- Zip Code: 49120

- Circle of Safety: Y
by JackF » Sat Jan 26, 2013 6:41 am
I misread the post. I read the post as the cylinder walls were measured along with everything as standard. I know you’re trying to get by without doing all the extra work, but check the piston ring gap like everyone is saying.
Make sure you don’t have a cylinder wall ridge at the top of the cylinder wall and about ¾ to a 1” down from the top of the cylinder on the thrust side try check for excessive cylinder wall wear.
I hope it works out.
I’m really good at doing nothing…With that said…I’m really, really good at doing nothing
-
JackF
- 501 Club

-
- Posts: 760
- Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2003 7:20 am
- Zip Code: 00000
Return to Farmall Cub
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: brian-centralohio, cn412gk, Kirk-NJ, tenn terry t and 6 guests
|
|