Cub 54 Grader Blade

Farmall Cub Forum -- Questions and answers to all of your Cub related issues.

Moderator: Team Cub

Forum rules
Notice: For sale and wanted posts are not allowed in this forum. Please use our free classifieds or one of our site sponsors for your tractor and parts needs.

Cub 54 Grader Blade

Postby ricky racer » Sat Aug 15, 2009 3:31 pm

As some of you may remember, I have a Cub 54 leveling and grader blade (1949 - 1952) that I added a power angle to. I recently acquired a newer (1953 on up) blade and am going to cherry pick some parts from it to use on mine, primarily the spring loaded wish bone in the front. I think that may be an improvement on my older set up. What I am wondering is would there be any advantage to using the newer frame mount bracket that attaches to the front bolster on the lower radiator tank?
The newer bracket is longer and instead of being vertical like the older one, it angles to the rear a few degrees. What are your thoughts on this?
My intent is to swap out the parts that I want and sell the second blade. Both blades will be good units, just mine will receive some updates. What do you think? Is there any advantage to using the newer style frame bracket?

This is my set up right now:
Image

I barrowed this picture from Pharmerphil to show the newer style plow that I am taking parts from (great looking Cub by the way) :

Image
1929 Farmall Regular
1935 John Deere B
1937 John Deere A
1941 John Deere H
1952 John Deere B
1953 Farmall Cub
User avatar
ricky racer
501 Club
501 Club
 
Posts: 2744
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:40 pm
Location: Niles / Buchanan, Michigan
Zip Code: 49120
Circle of Safety Award
Circle of Safety: Y

Re: Cub 54 Grader Blade

Postby KETCHAM » Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:55 pm

Nice!!!! Kevin :shock: :shock:
47 CUB[Krusty] 49 CUB[Ollie] 50 H-- PLOWS DISCS MOWERS AND lots more stuff!!Life is to short -Have fun now cause ya ain't gonna be here long!!!!
User avatar
KETCHAM
501 Club
501 Club
 
Posts: 5502
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Location: Marshallville Ohio
Zip Code: 44645
eBay ID: kevinb2366
Tractors Owned: 47 Cub 48 Cub 50 H

Re: Cub 54 Grader Blade

Postby Rudi » Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:07 pm

Rick:

I am in a similar quandry with my Cub-54 blade. I had a pair of the spring assist yokes made for my blade and Gord's blade, along with a few other parts to upgrade them to the newer 54-A style. However, we have still to acquire the newer hanger assembly and a few other items like the lifting lever. The newer hanger assembly is required if you have the newer style lifting lever. If you still intend to use the #650 292 R91 Lifting Lever and not go to the #651 259 R91 Lifting Lever, then the #650 145 R1 Hanger Front Axle is ok. If you use the newer #651 259 R91 Lifting Lever then the #651 269 R91 Hanger Front Axle is needed. I am still attempting to acquire a pair or at least one of the newer 651 269 R91 Hangers for our setups.
Confusion breeds Discussion which breeds Knowledge which breeds Confidence which breeds Friendship

User avatar
Rudi
Team Cub
Team Cub
 
Posts: 28425
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 8:37 pm
Location: NB Dieppe, Canada
Zip Code: E1A7J3
eBay ID: ve9rhs
Skype Name: R.H. "Rudi" Saueracker, SSM
Tractors Owned: 1947 Cub "Granny"
1948 Cub "Ellie-Mae"
1951 Cub "Jethro"
Dad's Putt-Putt
IH 129 CC
Circle of Safety Award
Circle of Safety: Y
Twitter ID: Rudi Saueracker, SSM

Re: Cub 54 Grader Blade

Postby ricky racer » Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:02 pm

Rudi wrote:Rick:

The newer hanger assembly is required if you have the newer style lifting lever. If you still intend to use the #650 292 R91 Lifting Lever and not go to the #651 259 R91 Lifting Lever, then the #650 145 R1 Hanger Front Axle is ok. If you use the newer #651 259 R91 Lifting Lever then the #651 269 R91 Hanger Front Axle is needed.


Thanks for the response Rudi but you got some 'splaining to do. Using the spring assist yoke will require the use of the newer #651 259 R91 lift arm, (I'm using your part numbers as I don't have a parts manual to reference) due to the increased offset required to mate with the new yoke. The older one has no offset and will not work. Looking at both of the hanger brackets laying on the shop floor I don't see why the older one would not work with the newer lift arm. Am I missing something?
1929 Farmall Regular
1935 John Deere B
1937 John Deere A
1941 John Deere H
1952 John Deere B
1953 Farmall Cub
User avatar
ricky racer
501 Club
501 Club
 
Posts: 2744
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:40 pm
Location: Niles / Buchanan, Michigan
Zip Code: 49120
Circle of Safety Award
Circle of Safety: Y

Re: Cub 54 Grader Blade

Postby Rudi » Sun Aug 16, 2009 3:33 pm

Rick:




Rudi wrote:Rick:

I am in a similar quandry with my Cub-54 blade. I had a pair of the spring assist yokes made for my blade and Gord's blade, along with a few other parts to upgrade them to the newer 54-A style. However, we have still to acquire the newer hanger assembly and a few other items like the lifting lever. The newer hanger assembly is required if you have the newer style lifting lever. If you still intend to use the #650 292 R91 Lifting Lever and not go to the #651 259 R91 Lifting Lever, then the #650 145 R1 Hanger Front Axle is ok. If you use the newer #651 259 R91 Lifting Lever then the #651 269 R91 Hanger Front Axle is needed. I am still attempting to acquire a pair or at least one of the newer 651 269 R91 Hangers for our setups.


Not the best to demonstrate but Tom and Lynn have this on their site:

Image

Here is the other setup:

Image

And a thought just occured to me... why do we have to go to the newer style? I wonder if the old one is useable as well? If so, then maybe I won't have to worry about it. Always thought that the newer bracket was needed. Hmmmmmmm... gonna try that out at the fest on Labour Day... cause the last of the hydraulics is going to be setup. It does appear that the newer style is used to increase stability at the point where the bolt goes... hmmmmm...

Trying not to overthink. Need to go fix a Stratus.. back in a bit
Confusion breeds Discussion which breeds Knowledge which breeds Confidence which breeds Friendship

User avatar
Rudi
Team Cub
Team Cub
 
Posts: 28425
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 8:37 pm
Location: NB Dieppe, Canada
Zip Code: E1A7J3
eBay ID: ve9rhs
Skype Name: R.H. "Rudi" Saueracker, SSM
Tractors Owned: 1947 Cub "Granny"
1948 Cub "Ellie-Mae"
1951 Cub "Jethro"
Dad's Putt-Putt
IH 129 CC
Circle of Safety Award
Circle of Safety: Y
Twitter ID: Rudi Saueracker, SSM

Re: Cub 54 Grader Blade

Postby ricky racer » Sun Aug 16, 2009 4:43 pm

Rudi wrote:Rick:




Rudi wrote:Rick:

I am in a similar quandry with my Cub-54 blade. I had a pair of the spring assist yokes made for my blade and Gord's blade, along with a few other parts to upgrade them to the newer 54-A style. However, we have still to acquire the newer hanger assembly and a few other items like the lifting lever. The newer hanger assembly is required if you have the newer style lifting lever. If you still intend to use the #650 292 R91 Lifting Lever and not go to the #651 259 R91 Lifting Lever, then the #650 145 R1 Hanger Front Axle is ok. If you use the newer #651 259 R91 Lifting Lever then the #651 269 R91 Hanger Front Axle is needed. I am still attempting to acquire a pair or at least one of the newer 651 269 R91 Hangers for our setups.


Not the best to demonstrate but Tom and Lynn have this on their site:

Image

Here is the other setup:

Image

And a thought just occured to me... why do we have to go to the newer style? I wonder if the old one is useable as well? If so, then maybe I won't have to worry about it. Always thought that the newer bracket was needed. Hmmmmmmm... gonna try that out at the fest on Labour Day... cause the last of the hydraulics is going to be setup. It does appear that the newer style is used to increase stability at the point where the bolt goes... hmmmmm...

Trying not to overthink. Need to go fix a Stratus.. back in a bit


From what I can see, the older bracket should work just fine. I had added the additional bracket, to stabilize the bolt, last year and that was definitely a good upgrade (see 1st photo below). I think other than the newer style lift arm and the connecting link which attaches to the rock shaft (see 2nd photo below) the only other item that you will have to change is the bell crank extension. Due to the offset in the newer arm the boomerang bell crank extension is needed. Thanks for the input Rudi. If I run into any other problems, I'll let you know.

Image

Image
1929 Farmall Regular
1935 John Deere B
1937 John Deere A
1941 John Deere H
1952 John Deere B
1953 Farmall Cub
User avatar
ricky racer
501 Club
501 Club
 
Posts: 2744
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:40 pm
Location: Niles / Buchanan, Michigan
Zip Code: 49120
Circle of Safety Award
Circle of Safety: Y


Return to Farmall Cub

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alan Riley, Bob McCarty, LtMike and 3 guests