Opinions for 47 Engine?
Forum rules
Notice: For sale and wanted posts are not allowed in this forum. Please use our free classifieds or one of our site sponsors for your tractor and parts needs.
Notice: For sale and wanted posts are not allowed in this forum. Please use our free classifieds or one of our site sponsors for your tractor and parts needs.
-
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:39 am
- Zip Code: 26047
- Tractors Owned: 1949 Farmall Cub
1947 Farmall Cub
1954 Farmall Cub - Location: New Cumberland, WV
Opinions for 47 Engine?
I figured I would do some evaluating for later. I found the following.
The cylinder bores measure out of spec (except at the bottom where they are nominal). I'm getting 2.630-2.635 1-1/2" down depending on what cylinder. The pistons are std. and had .20 over rod bearing installed. The rod work looks pretty recent.
The bores still show some crosshatch on the ring wear area and very visible below that.
I have to wonder why someone would go to this extent and not fix a rear main that is leaving badly.
Door number one is what to do with the block. The tractor will see very little work. It will serve as a demonstration tractor for local events with a hammer mill on occasion. Probably will never even have a mower on it.
Any thoughts appreciated!
The cylinder bores measure out of spec (except at the bottom where they are nominal). I'm getting 2.630-2.635 1-1/2" down depending on what cylinder. The pistons are std. and had .20 over rod bearing installed. The rod work looks pretty recent.
The bores still show some crosshatch on the ring wear area and very visible below that.
I have to wonder why someone would go to this extent and not fix a rear main that is leaving badly.
Door number one is what to do with the block. The tractor will see very little work. It will serve as a demonstration tractor for local events with a hammer mill on occasion. Probably will never even have a mower on it.
Any thoughts appreciated!
WV Mike
-
- Team Cub Mentor
- Posts: 20089
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:52 pm
- Zip Code: 65051
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Mo. Linn
Re: Opinions for 47 Engine?
Since you are not planning on working the engine hard, I wouldn't go to the expense of over boring the cylinders.
Spend a lot of time on the internet looking for .010 oversized rings. Or get .020 oversized rings and file down the ring ends.
Spend a lot of time on the internet looking for .010 oversized rings. Or get .020 oversized rings and file down the ring ends.
I have an excuse. CRS.
-
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:39 am
- Zip Code: 26047
- Tractors Owned: 1949 Farmall Cub
1947 Farmall Cub
1954 Farmall Cub - Location: New Cumberland, WV
Re: Opinions for 47 Engine?
I spent a lot of time as well. I don't think they exist. I never thought about filing. 020 over rings. Never done it so and hints I'd appreciate. How do you deal with the oil rings?
Thanks
Thanks
WV Mike
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 4894
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 2:08 pm
- Zip Code: 12514
- Circle of Safety: Y
Re: Opinions for 47 Engine?
they never made .010 rings, IH said use standards on .010 pistons, that is a bad thing, filing down rings is NG either as the right is not kept "round" when compressed
-
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 10:24 am
- Zip Code: 19342
- Tractors Owned: 1948 6v - Dozer
1949 with kub klipper belly mower. mag 6v - Mom
1950 with plow, 54 blade, mott mag 6v - Roxanne
1953 54 blade, c22, wood 42 6v
1957 6v - barn Queen
1965 lo-boy with c-3 mower 12 v - Loboy
1974 Horse II 12 v c-2
1975 with woods 42-6 12 v - Horse
1979 long strip 12 v stuck engine
130 with international 1000 loader 6 v
1969 140 with bush hog tow behind mower 12 v
Terramite T-6 4WD Backhoe Perkins diesel
Memberships: Rough and Tumble Engineers Historical Association;Chapter 8 IH Collectors; IH Collectors Worldwide - Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Glen Mills PA
Re: Opinions for 47 Engine?
If you are going to spend the time and the money you should get the machine work done and use the proper positions and rings. There is no sense putting money and time is new parts that will not last long.
"Do or do not there is no try" as Yoda says.
"Do or do not there is no try" as Yoda says.
When you only have 9 horsepower you need to know the names of all of the ponies!
-
- Team Cub Mentor
- Posts: 20089
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:52 pm
- Zip Code: 65051
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Mo. Linn
Re: Opinions for 47 Engine?
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=26195&hilit=filing+piston+ring+ends
Piston ring end gap and available piston rings has been discussed before.
There are custom piston and piston ring manufacturers. Used them before to find piston rings "not available" at the auto parts store.
Piston ring end gap and available piston rings has been discussed before.
There are custom piston and piston ring manufacturers. Used them before to find piston rings "not available" at the auto parts store.
I have an excuse. CRS.
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 7388
- Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 5:02 pm
- Zip Code: 00000
- Location: in northern usa
Re: Opinions for 47 Engine?
I use this adjustable hone to bore with, you need a dial bore gauge too. They have rough stones and smoother grit stones. It’s not hard to do.
https://www.enginehones.com/lisle15000.html
https://www.enginehones.com/m50160.html
I believe in doing it once and doing it right don’t skimp.
https://www.enginehones.com/lisle15000.html
https://www.enginehones.com/m50160.html
I believe in doing it once and doing it right don’t skimp.
I'm technically misunderstood at times i guess its been this way my whole life so why should it change now.
-
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:39 am
- Zip Code: 26047
- Tractors Owned: 1949 Farmall Cub
1947 Farmall Cub
1954 Farmall Cub - Location: New Cumberland, WV
Re: Opinions for 47 Engine?
I have a bore gage. Can you accurately hone the length of the bore to .020 over with just a good quality cylinder hone?
A little update. The rods are. 020 under and the mains are. 010 under. I pulled one main lower. It doesn't look so great. I'm very curious why the cylinder walls still show some crosshatch remaining like little wear but the bearings are showing much heavier wear.
A little update. The rods are. 020 under and the mains are. 010 under. I pulled one main lower. It doesn't look so great. I'm very curious why the cylinder walls still show some crosshatch remaining like little wear but the bearings are showing much heavier wear.
WV Mike
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 7388
- Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 5:02 pm
- Zip Code: 00000
- Location: in northern usa
Re: Opinions for 47 Engine?
Yes, use the hone I listed above, rough stones to open the bore up. The hone will feel tight on one end if there’s a taper in the bore stay where it’s tight till the bore feels the same then mic it, as you get close to the bore size you want switch to the fine stones. Keep it wet with honing oil. Chrome rings, tight cross hatch, castiron rings looser cross hatch.
I'm technically misunderstood at times i guess its been this way my whole life so why should it change now.
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:40 pm
- Zip Code: 49120
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Niles / Buchanan, Michigan
Re: Opinions for 47 Engine?
inairam wrote:If you are going to spend the time and the money you should get the machine work done and use the proper positions and rings. There is no sense putting money and time is new parts that will not last long.
"Do or do not there is no try" as Yoda says.



1929 Farmall Regular
1935 John Deere B
1937 John Deere A
1941 John Deere H
1952 John Deere B
1953 Farmall Cub
1935 John Deere B
1937 John Deere A
1941 John Deere H
1952 John Deere B
1953 Farmall Cub
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 7388
- Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 5:02 pm
- Zip Code: 00000
- Location: in northern usa
Re: Opinions for 47 Engine?
I do all my own boring. That hone is gear driven adjustable. It’s the same as the sunnen hone I had. I don’t trust anyone doing my machine shop work. I had one automotive machinist mess up boring and pressing the wrist pins. No more trusting anyone.
I'm technically misunderstood at times i guess its been this way my whole life so why should it change now.
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:40 pm
- Zip Code: 49120
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Niles / Buchanan, Michigan
Re: Opinions for 47 Engine?
ctltmp wrote:I'm very curious why the cylinder walls still show some crosshatch remaining like little wear but the bearings are showing much heavier wear.
20200622_165211.jpg
That happens because someone previous to you did a lousy attempt at fixing a worn out motor. The reason there is some crosshatch in the cylinders is it was apart recently for a "rebuild", but they didn't want to do it right, they wanted to cheap out, throw in some new rings and say, "that's good enough". Obviously it wasn't because now you've got it and pulling it apart again. In my opinion, if you pull a motor apart because it's worn, you have two choices, throw it away or fix it. Putting new rings in is a waste of time and money as far as I'm concerned. If you can do most of the work yourself, it doesn't cost that much to rebuild an engine. Shop around and get estimates on charges for machine work and look for the best deal. I was looking between 3 engine shops when I rebuilt my last Cub last fall. That build is in the link below. I hope this helps.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=105338&p=834090&hilit=cost+of+rebuilding#p834090
1929 Farmall Regular
1935 John Deere B
1937 John Deere A
1941 John Deere H
1952 John Deere B
1953 Farmall Cub
1935 John Deere B
1937 John Deere A
1941 John Deere H
1952 John Deere B
1953 Farmall Cub
-
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:39 am
- Zip Code: 26047
- Tractors Owned: 1949 Farmall Cub
1947 Farmall Cub
1954 Farmall Cub - Location: New Cumberland, WV
Re: Opinions for 47 Engine?
Rick your block looks fantastic. Prices seem reasonable. Think I'll make some calls. I have to split it anyway.
Electrician at work has 2 47's in his barn he's been wanting me to look at. I know they run and that's about all. May have a better motor in one of them.
Electrician at work has 2 47's in his barn he's been wanting me to look at. I know they run and that's about all. May have a better motor in one of them.
WV Mike
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 4894
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 2:08 pm
- Zip Code: 12514
- Circle of Safety: Y
Re: Opinions for 47 Engine?
A hone is made for finishing cylinders, not designed to bore, yes you can do it but if the cylinder is worn to a taper it will not correct the taper, tapered cylinders need to be bored
-
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 1:09 pm
- Zip Code: 32736
- Tractors Owned: The crew:
"John", 1952 Cub
"Paul", 1951 Cub
"George", 1958 LoBoy Cub with Wagner 45 Loader
"Ringo", 1977 Cub
So far, Paul and Ringo have arrived. John and George were supposed to follow ages ago, but apparently have gone awol. Long story. - Circle of Safety: Y
Re: Opinions for 47 Engine?
I’ve just been pondering the last few weeks about how much engine work is really practical to DIY and how much you really had better contract out to not make a mess of it. It seems we are getting close to an answer here.
If I had a dollar for every time I was stewing over a question in my head only to have someone else on the forum ask almost exactly the same question... I could afford to buy more Cubs!
If I had a dollar for every time I was stewing over a question in my head only to have someone else on the forum ask almost exactly the same question... I could afford to buy more Cubs!
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 21
- 821
-
by Dusty B
Wed Dec 09, 2020 2:36 pm
-
- 12
- 956
-
by BigBill
Thu Jun 25, 2020 6:16 pm
-
- 4
- 235
-
by Don McCombs
Tue Jul 27, 2021 10:49 am
-
- 4
- 433
-
by Pwalker21
Mon Jun 07, 2021 2:00 pm
-
- 13
- 588
-
by Magnum
Sat Mar 12, 2022 9:13 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests