This site uses cookies to maintain login information on FarmallCub.Com. Click the X in the banner upper right corner to close this notice. For more information on our privacy policy, visit this link:
Privacy Policy

NEW REGISTERED MEMBERS: Be sure to check your SPAM/JUNK folders for the activation email.

Rear ballast?

The Cub Club -- Questions and answers to all of your Cub related issues.
Forum rules
Notice: For sale and wanted posts are not allowed in this forum. Please use our free classifieds or one of our site sponsors for your tractor and parts needs.
DZG
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 7:04 am
Zip Code: 49247

Rear ballast?

Postby DZG » Sat Jun 26, 2021 7:38 am

Hey guys first post in many, many years here but i have a, lossibly stupid, question...

Is it possible to over ballast a cub? I got rimguard in the tires (pry right around 130-135lbs per side) and just bought a set of 150lb (per side) wheel weights...so roughly 280per tire and 560 total. I know cubs arnt quite as fragile as they are made out to be but im not risking breaking anything am i?

User avatar
Bill V in Md
10+ Years
10+ Years
Posts: 1128
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 6:51 pm
Zip Code: 21228
Tractors Owned: 1948 Farmall Cub
LT1045 Cub Cadet
Circle of Safety: Y
Location: MD, Catonsville

Re: Rear ballast?

Postby Bill V in Md » Sat Jun 26, 2021 8:08 am

A standard configuration for the Cub is to have two wheel weights on each rear tire, which would amount to about 300 lbs per side. I have been running my cub that way for several years with no problems.
Bill VanHooser
Cub 54 Blade, Cub 193 Moldboard Plow, Cub 28A Disc Harrow
Circle of Safety

User avatar
ricky racer
10+ Years
10+ Years
Posts: 6356
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:40 pm
Zip Code: 49120
Circle of Safety: Y
Location: Niles / Buchanan, Michigan

Re: Rear ballast?

Postby ricky racer » Sat Jun 26, 2021 8:13 am

That should not be any problem at all. I've been running double rear weights for years. Having ballast is a good thing, it makes the tractor more stable and helps reduce tire slippage.
1929 Farmall Regular
1935 John Deere B
1937 John Deere A
1941 John Deere H
1952 John Deere B
1953 Farmall Cub

DZG
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 7:04 am
Zip Code: 49247

Re: Rear ballast?

Postby DZG » Sat Jun 26, 2021 8:54 am

ricky racer wrote:That should not be any problem at all. I've been running double rear weights for years. Having ballast is a good thing, it makes the tractor more stable and helps reduce tire slippage.

Thats why im adding the weights lol. When i first got the tractor it just had air in the tires and honestly it was worthless for anything besides mowing. The rimguard helped ALOT but it still seems to break traction way before the motor runs out of power.

Bill V in Md wrote:A standard configuration for the Cub is to have two wheel weights on each rear tire, which would amount to about 300 lbs per side. I have been running my cub that way for several years with no problems.


I did not know 300lbs was pretty standard. I wont worry then. Tbanks guys

User avatar
Glen
10+ Years
10+ Years
Posts: 6184
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:33 pm
Zip Code: 00000
Tractors Owned: 1956 Farmall Cub with Fast Hitch, F-11 plow, Disc, Cultivator, Cub-22 mower
Circle of Safety: Y
Location: Wa.

Re: Rear ballast?

Postby Glen » Sat Jun 26, 2021 7:16 pm

Hi,
The style of rear tire tread makes a difference in how a Cub pulls.

The 45 degree straight bars work well.
Curved treads like they had in the late 1940's don't work as well.
We had one of them on a Cub, the traction was not as good as the 45 degree bars, which may be why IH put the tires with the 45 degree bars on Cubs after the others, in the 1950's.

Our neighbor had a 1948 Cub for decades that had the curved tread rear tires, he said it got stuck easy.

Below is a page from the 1949 Cub owner's manual showing the curved tread.

http://farmallcub.com/rudi_cub/www.clea ... age-44.jpg

Below is a page from the 1955 Cub operator's manual showing the 45 degree bar tread.

http://farmallcub.com/rudi_cub/www.clea ... e%2003.jpg

I've never had a Cub with the newer 23 degree bars on the rear tires, they are supposed to work better than 45 degree bars, I guess. :)

DZG
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 7:04 am
Zip Code: 49247

Re: Rear ballast?

Postby DZG » Mon Jun 28, 2021 8:25 am

Glen wrote:Hi,
The style of rear tire tread makes a difference in how a Cub pulls.

The 45 degree straight bars work well.
Curved treads like they had in the late 1940's don't work as well.
We had one of them on a Cub, the traction was not as good as the 45 degree bars, which may be why IH put the tires with the 45 degree bars on Cubs after the others, in the 1950's.

Our neighbor had a 1948 Cub for decades that had the curved tread rear tires, he said it got stuck easy.

Below is a page from the 1949 Cub owner's manual showing the curved tread.

http://farmallcub.com/rudi_cub/www.clea ... age-44.jpg

Below is a page from the 1955 Cub operator's manual showing the 45 degree bar tread.

http://farmallcub.com/rudi_cub/www.clea ... e%2003.jpg

I've never had a Cub with the newer 23 degree bars on the rear tires, they are supposed to work better than 45 degree bars, I guess. :)


Good info on that. Mines definatly got the older style tires. I know just loading the tires made a massive difference so im hoping the weights will improve it that much more. My tires are in good shape yet i hate to replace them lol.

Matt Kirsch
10+ Years
10+ Years
Posts: 4956
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 3:04 pm
Zip Code: 14559
Circle of Safety: Y
Location: Rochester, NY

Re: Rear ballast?

Postby Matt Kirsch » Mon Jun 28, 2021 4:14 pm

The manual also describes installing one or two sets of wheel weights.

Of course keep in mind your mileage may vary, as we are talking about a... well, since you didn't say what year Cub... a really old tractor here. Even the '79's are over 40 years old, and the '47s are 74. You don't know what's going on inside, what's on the verge of failure due to normal wear and tear.

Should something go awry, it wasn't anything you did or any design flaw in the tractor. It was age and wear. Just keep your expectations realistic.

DZG
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 7:04 am
Zip Code: 49247

Re: Rear ballast?

Postby DZG » Mon Jun 28, 2021 6:03 pm

Matt Kirsch wrote:The manual also describes installing one or two sets of wheel weights.

Of course keep in mind your mileage may vary, as we are talking about a... well, since you didn't say what year Cub... a really old tractor here. Even the '79's are over 40 years old, and the '47s are 74. You don't know what's going on inside, what's on the verge of failure due to normal wear and tear.

Should something go awry, it wasn't anything you did or any design flaw in the tractor. It was age and wear. Just keep your expectations realistic.


Absolutly. My cub is a 48 and has actually been in family since new. My great grandpa bought it in 48. Its actually lead a pretty easy life. I dont beat it but i definantly use it. However in the future it may have some company in the barn by way of an A or C, or maybe even an H, or hell maybe a N series ford lol.

User avatar
Glen
10+ Years
10+ Years
Posts: 6184
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:33 pm
Zip Code: 00000
Tractors Owned: 1956 Farmall Cub with Fast Hitch, F-11 plow, Disc, Cultivator, Cub-22 mower
Circle of Safety: Y
Location: Wa.

Re: Rear ballast?

Postby Glen » Wed Jun 30, 2021 5:04 pm

Hi,
I sent you a PM.

DZG
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 7:04 am
Zip Code: 49247

Re: Rear ballast?

Postby DZG » Fri Jul 09, 2021 7:15 am

Well thought id stop by and fill yall in since i got the weights mounted. Currently running around 135lbs of rimguard and 145lb of wheelweight per tire (so...280 per side if my math is correct) and i literally CANNOT believe the difference the extra weight made.

I needed to go back and scrape out the muddy mess that was where my horse stall exited into the pasture (the stall goes a bit downhill as did the side outside so all the water collected in a "bowl" right where the horse walked), it was over ankle deep gunky mud and the little cub with the belly blade shoved it all out IN ONE PASS....well two, cause the stall is about twice as wide as the blade lol...but still. Before it would of never dreamed of it.

I also got the hills graded so it all runs downhill now in the pasture...took me about 4 hours total (got caught in a monsoon...you dont realizehow slow a cub is untill youre in 3rd wide open racing for the barn in a hellacious downpour)....

But either way bottom line is i am more then happy with the cub now and it actually works like i always thought it should....the motor actually pulls against the governor and moves stuff instead of a tire just spinning lol,

Best 200 bucks i ever spent.


  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Farmall Cub”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests