This site uses cookies to maintain login information on FarmallCub.Com. Click the X in the banner upper right corner to close this notice. For more information on our privacy policy, visit this link:
Privacy Policy

NEW REGISTERED MEMBERS: Be sure to check your SPAM/JUNK folders for the activation email.

rebuilt motor that is too tight.

The Cub Club -- Questions and answers to all of your Cub related issues.
Forum rules
Notice: For sale and wanted posts are not allowed in this forum. Please use our free classifieds or one of our site sponsors for your tractor and parts needs.
pett3227b
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 7:28 am
Zip Code: 28327

rebuilt motor that is too tight.

Postby pett3227b » Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:48 pm

I have rebuilt my 47' motor and assembled it and it was too tight to turn over the crank with the hand crank. I have made a few posts about it. I did neglect to lube some of the friction wear areas. I plastigauged the main and rod bearings. They are within spec. I had a machinist check the piston to bore clearance and It is a little below spec. The manual says that it needs to be within 1.6 to 2.4 thousands in clearance. The actual clearance is 1.5 thousandths. My question is should I have my machinist hone the block a little more and get it within the proper range? It's mighty close but would it help much?

Eugene
Team Cub Mentor
Team Cub Mentor
Posts: 20393
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:52 pm
Zip Code: 65051
Circle of Safety: Y
Location: Mo. Linn

Re: rebuilt motor that is too tight.

Postby Eugene » Tue Jun 20, 2023 4:29 pm

pett3227b wrote:I have rebuilt my 47' motor and assembled it and it was too tight to turn over the crank with the hand crank.
I had a machinist check the piston to bore clearance and it is a little below spec.
Your machinist recommended what?

Recommend you disassemble the engine one piece at a time. After piece is removed, check to see if you can turn the engine with the hand crank.

My guess, rod and/or main bearings are to tight. Another option, wrong piston rings.
I have an excuse. CRS.

User avatar
ricky racer
10+ Years
10+ Years
Posts: 6348
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:40 pm
Zip Code: 49120
Circle of Safety: Y
Location: Niles / Buchanan, Michigan

Re: rebuilt motor that is too tight.

Postby ricky racer » Tue Jun 20, 2023 4:49 pm

Was the ring end gap within spec? Normally main or rod bearings too tight would be the suspected problem however you said the clearance was good. The next thing I'd suspect would be the piston fit. I doubt the. 0001" undersize would cause the issue but no end gap could.
1929 Farmall Regular
1935 John Deere B
1937 John Deere A
1941 John Deere H
1952 John Deere B
1953 Farmall Cub

tst
10+ Years
10+ Years
Posts: 5229
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 2:08 pm
Zip Code: 12514
Circle of Safety: Y

Re: rebuilt motor that is too tight.

Postby tst » Tue Jun 20, 2023 6:54 pm

did you end gap the rings ? did the crank turn easy before loading the pistons in the block ?
I have rebuilt many of these for customers, with the rings end gapped and on the piston, install in cylinder and see how it slides in cylinder with out being bolted to the crank, I did have a set of new pistons once where the ring grooves were not machined deep enough so they were super tight


  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Farmall Cub”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests